English writing

People behind me are talking elongation factors, which is an idea from molecular biology. I’m typing this is due to create a first writing in the “serious English writing” catalogue, while suffering in severely allergic to Spring pollen. Definitely, I’m doing something special which is normally not be done by Chinese students in US, except some literature major students or JDs. But JD student might be too busy to write casually, nor did literature students have such terrible writing as me. Therefore, I do consider the writing like this is weird.

When I first consider to practice my English writing, I was only think about the potential usage of this language. I mean, to make law career as part of a personal life, a good English writing skill is necessary. However, this thought might be too utilitarianism to improve the real ability of operating this cultural tool. I start to think as a native English speaking since the logic behind this language is different from Chinese. This days during my study of LSAT, I did think a lot (which might not be the suitable thing to do during the high-tense study) about this language. (Here should be some high level words coming out to present the writer’s profound ideas, unfortunately, the writer haven’t managed enough words yet.)

I noticed that English is quit different from Chinese, since each Chinese word, or character, could represent at least a single meaning, but each letter could only play a role of pronunciation component. Each Chinese word could be expressed by a single syllable but represent a complex meaning based on the writing of the word, which is actually a picture. However, the English need several syllables to create a word to make a “word”. Obviously, the efficiency and efficacy of Chinese is much better than that of English, and this subtle difference will be aggregated in comparison of longer paragraphs expressing the same ideas.

Other than that, to consider Korean and Japanese are also somehow using “pronunciation-indicating” method of language other than the “meaning-indicating” method of Chinese, Korean and Japanese or even Arabic languages might probably be easily learned or used but won’t be as either time-saving or spacing-saving as Chinese. (In this case, is it possible that Chinese may contain more meanings within limited words, so that it makes Chinese more careful on talking and behavior? — and which make Chinese a little bit , culturally different? Be a little more complicated than other? More like pholosophers? If, we found that ancients from different regions of the world had thought similar questions and offered similar answers, could we consider the efficiency and efficacy of thinking was similar. Then, the tool of thinking, language, logic , why those things bring such great differences?— which make Chinese or Asian’s more sensitive or more, meta-philosophical, while western countries more logical? Why today the most meta-philosophical, which in my opinion is more like religion-believers……no, it is not right, because you don’t have data to show which region of people have the larger population of theists)

This is quite interesting. As a beginning of a serious writing, I think, it’s fine so far based on my English strength temporary.

Here is an idea coming out when I was reading the Chapter 7 of the power of habit.
This chapter was talking about how big data collect people’s life and observe and conclude that. As an always deviate, I somehow started to consider my personal behavior which is far from the normal. I was trying to say: when an observed people knew he/she was under observed, will she/he change or force themselves to make a different choice? Will this subjective change force human being evolved?

Let’s separate entire human being into two groups: one group of people is well-educated, could give response or reaction to the society. the other group is not self-concoscious

the structure of this essay:
define two group of people. indicate their function to this society.
their reaction when they probably heard about the big data.

evolution definition.
how we consider the human society influencing ourselves and how human being evolve.

原本以为逃掉了的花粉过敏，在春假结束之后，妥妥地袭来。猝不及防啊。

一直想说如果能把blog的页面创建超过两个，然后把啰里八嗦的涂鸦和认真写的文章都分开来，就要清爽很多。每次点进一个页面之后就开始胡敲。
忽然想到标签。原本很抵触用标签的原因仔细想来应该是因为不够可视化。如果是因为这样，那么多个页面其实应该赋予不同的功能。而所有的文章就该统统放到一起去。
那么该有啥样的标签呢？自己首先希望有一个吐槽用的twitter，然后肯定要一个絮絮叨叨的页面。然后要一个认真写作的页面。还要有一个英文写作的页面。
这么一想，忽然觉得可以接受这种标签的分类模式了。似乎更加符合数据的规划和 整理。也比较节约空间。

我每次都是这样啊，明明是人家的好的建议，自己要真的理解透彻之后，才能用起来。虽然说这样也不坏吧，但是总感觉浪费了好多时间。。。
那就是，看到别人的建议之后，尽快去理解和尝试应用。这样的话，学习速度会不会变得更快一点？

哦，啊，我的眼睛啊啊啊啊，好麻烦好麻烦！！！

不知道手机上的wordpress可不可以发一些诸如twitter之类的东西。我自己写的絮絮叨叨东西，是给我自己看的。