Author Archives: maxyuan

奶油

村上春树在最新一期的纽约客上,发表了一篇名为《奶油》的短篇小说。是英文的。起初觉得,居然真的从中读出了村上的感觉。虽然一直深知他的英文功底深厚,但是这是第一次从英文视角来读,不由得肃然起敬。读罢,在篇末发现了是一位译者从日文翻译来的。可此时更加觉得心中倾佩得很:
因为无论用了哪种语言,虽说日语读不懂,但是,一位作家的文风和讲故事的方法,在中文和英文里都让我读出了共鸣感,这实在是太棒了。
就也真的觉得,自己的确是有跟着村上的思路,跟着他的理解,来读他的书。感觉自己的确也是能够跟得上他的讲述。
心下也欣喜得很。
而另外一方面,可能是因为,和他老人家(也没那么老),在很多观念上是有谋合之处。所以读起来尤其觉得舒服。
像是找到一个志同道合的朋友,觉得欣喜得很。

此外觉得很困惑,但是又很扼腕的是:你说林少华,翻译了那么多的书,却为何会不自觉表现出那样的恣肆?
挺为他觉得可惜的。
陡然想到,是否他觉得自己是村上的中文代言了?好比章金莱觉得六小龄童便绝等于了孙悟空?
他们是不是变成这样了:活在他人的世界里了,这种把偶像糅合入自己的生活,再把自己的生活或是成就偶像化。可是,他们原本的自己呢?
再说回来。其实杨洁导演,或才是西游记影视化的主要功臣吧。

告密和举报

读到“端媒体”发布的一篇文章,忽然一下领悟到一些之前没想到的点。
首先,“告密”行为,诸如文革时期一些孩子举报父母行为之类的,以此来博得社会认同。
(此处可以讨论社会认同和家庭观念之间的一些点。思考之前社会,和当前社会的一些点)
然后“举报”,比如关于小崔近期的一些事情。
然后文章衍生出讨论,大抵是关于,“告密”本身助长了专权,蔑视了法治。而“举报”行为则是另外一回事,是一种法治的行为。
想到了《野兽》里面,男主最后去告发了办税问题。

但是让我陡然想到点,是《闻香识女人》里面的那个case
其实之前一直会有些疑惑的,为什么一个学生法庭之间的是否相互告发之类的行为,会被拿到那样的电影里作为一个讨论。
后来,今早意识到,这是一个“告密”行为。
陡然意识到这个问题的重要程度。
由此又想到了《死亡诗社》里面最后的告密行为。

然后想到了人的社会性,如何建立人类社会。一些根本纽带。诸如此类。
这个问题可以深挖得特别深刻。

有机会的时候,拓展来写吧。

大写一个fu字

早上想了一下,还是给Dr. Bernard发了邮件。没想到收到了巨长的回复,是一堆针对文章的细节。
囧到了
起初心里想了:我勒个去我已经把修改稿提交了啊。但是,果然是长大了么,淡定地想到,这其实没什么。然后去给杂志编辑发邮件了,去讨更多的时间来做更进一步的修改。
感觉,自己就是这么被人身体力行地感染到了。真正的科研精神,这种做事精神,我实在是还差得远啊!!!
我也是有福气,也是服气得很。这么想着:既然你的确这么诚恳认真,又这么善意满满!我认!一定踏踏实实规规矩矩地来完成你的建议和要求!

1.17

Robert其实算是个很外向的老爷爷。
能够感觉到,他来咖啡馆,是希望能够和社会保持联系。
年龄渐长之后,如何和社会维系关系,却又不会喧宾夺主?
那么,从另一个角度来看,年轻人该如何平衡自己对社会的ambition及衍生出的相关情绪,同时又能够平心静气地承接前辈的经验?

什么叫“功利”?

陡然想到有被人无意地评价到的这个点。
十分仔细地掂量了一下。
笑了。
说出这样的话的人,实在是:一,不了解功利;二,不了解我。
释然太多了。

《亲密关系》读书笔记 1

读电子书的时候,写批注有点儿不那么方便。但是反之,可以写得更仔细一点?
关于第二章,研究方法里面,提到了把心理学,人际关系科学化,并且和物理学,生物学,化学相提并论。
感觉这里有些问题:
1)客观vs.主观
自然科学和社会科学的差异性是十分显著的。
首先,科学本质上是一种观察证伪的方法。物理生物化学,都是对自然现象进行客观总结,然后定量or定性进行分辨,再构建相互之间的逻辑关系。这其中,利用科学手段来验证其中的逻辑关系合理性。
而此时,社会科学的定量和定性其实十分模糊。a)时间跨度极大(感觉和研究历史必然性or偶然性一样),b)每个瞬间定量的准确度如何测量?这个测量方式是否要用一个社会符号来定义?(货币?层级?)(“幸福指数”又如何定义??)
c)如果这些定量方式很有难度,那么是否会落入“讲道理”的模式?或者说,这种科学研究,其实是在提出某个理论后,看现实社会里的案例数据是否符合这一期望?(先构架理论,再将数据往期望理论里套?—-这又的确存在于很多劣质的理科研究中。)(“研究”所存在的共同问题。)

这类研究,如此重要,但找出所谓的“合理”和“真理”(reasonable and truthful),非常的难。

2)读者的意识层次
这类书籍明显有极高的门槛。试想了一下,如果不具备critical thinking,如果对逻辑认知薄弱,如果对自我的反省不够深刻,如果不接受广义上的“普世价值”(大抵来说,对生活的意义追求,对存在主义的肯定,对生命的尊重,对真实的定义和认同),如果在实际生活行为中不能身体力行(知行合一,或至少有行动的趋势),那么很可能不会读这样的书(或者不会踏实地阅读)
其实囫囵吞枣地阅读,或者试图寻找快捷方式来寻找表面问题的直接对策,很明显是无法从这书中找到答案的。甚至会本末倒置。
但是,又想到,如果是上述的那种尚且没有做好准备的读者,他们或许也不会成为这丛书的“读者”。
我想到的是,如果未来,看到身边的人有解惑的需要,自己一定要注意自己的言行,不要动辄给别人推荐这套书。
学习终究是一个主动行为。
给别人推荐书(如果不是真正意义上的爱书的人),可能并不那么好。
由此,又发觉,这样困难的研究,能够再付诸于社会实践中,又是多么辛苦的一个过程。
忽然意识到,social engineer这个称谓,其实如果能做得好,那该是多么地不容易。

但是这个社会的确亟待这样的人们出现。

1.13

今早醒来的梦有点累。梦见了许多人,大多都是村里的人。
如果在现实生活里和人们打交道,却并不会觉得“累”。
所以,其实我现在是活在梦里吗,如果按照更多的人的体验来说。
如果是噩梦的话,就让我早点醒来吧。

很奇妙的事。等来到星巴克时,这儿放着《汉密尔顿》作为背景音乐。似乎是Remix版本的。

不久前读到一句话,似乎是朋友圈里某个ABC发的:
傲不可长,欲不可纵,志不可满,乐不可极。
搜了一下,说是《礼记》里的文字。
老祖宗的东西,真个是很多好东西。

由此又想到在读社会心理学丛书,里面有这样一句话,挺认同的:“心理学不幸是由西方人创建的,结果,西方的心理学研究了太多的变态心理和个性行为。如果心理学是由中国人创建的,那么他一定是一门强调社会心理学的基础学科。”
当然,如果较真的话,又要去讨论心理学的科学性等等。

不想去抬杠。能理解 Michael Harris Bond 所希望表达的意思就好。

碎碎念

周末到了。断断续续地做着事情。原本以为自己的状态可以用上三两天就能恢复,但事实上用了有一整个礼拜。
然后看着LSAT考试的改革,作文要开始机考了。下半年开始要从笔试切入机考模式了。也终于在deadline之前调整了时间。
我一直都觉得,守时是一件很不容易的事情。对别人的守时,其实相对要容易不少。但是面对自己,对自己立下的承诺要能坚守下去,则困难很多。你看,我能大约做到早睡早起,以及按时吃三餐。甚至可以再按压着自己去锻炼身体,乃至读一些虽然明知对自己有好处但的确枯燥无味得很的书。
但是,枯燥无味?
其实倒也不然。
昨天读到一些海德格尔的介绍。估计直接去啃其本人的作品,在近期内是很难实现的了。我想在这里提到他的一个点是,看似枯燥无味的东西,但是如果忘我地投入了,其实终归能感觉到不一样的存在。
回头看看,自己从17年到现在,两年了嗯。17年集中实验,出了一批次数据,18年也好歹拿到了学位。虽然说在这过程中,对自己的要求很多都没有做到,但是似乎主业上跌跌撞撞步履蹒跚地好歹有在进步。
那么这剩下的不到半年,4个多月吧也就扣去父母来访的时间,自己能不能再对自己更加守时一点?让自己每天计划的工作能再多一点的百分比完成度?
忘我地工作学习的时候,也能试着帮自己少想很多事情,虽然我是一个如此这般的人。
车送去修了。又是一大笔钱。今天拿不到,估摸着明后天能取到车。
不能再多想了嗯。赶紧收拾了去打球。

可以试着开始练习英文写作了。

今天和周小琪一家吃午饭为他们践行,看到她和宇衡和他们家的小Eva。心下十分感慨。尤其是自己会感觉到宇衡的一些变化,在和人相处之间的点点变化。
心中感慨蛮多的。我觉得自己应该也被周琪感染了许多。也在有很好地去接纳和学习了。回到办公室看到了被推送的一篇文字:

6 Toxic Relationship Habits Most People Think Are Normal
总结得很好啊。感觉能在其中看到过往的种种,有些在我自己身上有,有些在对方身上有。
想想看,从第一次来美国至今,即将满十年。十年自己的变化,的确是十分巨大的。这不限于感情生活,也包括学业和自我成长,包括和原生家庭父母的关系,包括很多方方面面。
总的来说,自己是很清醒的样子,也在成长着。

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/6-toxic-relationship-habits-most-people-think-are-normal

There’s no class in high school on how to not be a shitty boyfriend or girlfriend. Sure, they teach us the biology of sex, the legality of marriage, and maybe we read a few obscure love stories from the 19th century on how not to be.

But when it comes down to actually handling the nitty-gritty of relationships, we’re given no pointers… or worse, we’re given advice columns in women’s magazines.

Yes, it’s trial-and-error from the get-go. And if you’re like most people, it’s been mostly error.

But part of the problem is that many unhealthy relationship habits are baked into our culture. We worship romantic love — you know, that dizzying and irrational romantic love that somehow finds breaking china plates on the wall in a fit of tears somewhat endearing — and scoff at practicality or unconventional sexualities. Men and women are raised to objectify each other and to objectify their relationships. Thus, our partners are often seen as assets rather than someone to share mutual emotional support.

A lot of the self-help literature out there isn’t helpful either (no, men and women are not from different planets, you over-generalizing prick). And for most of us, mom and dad surely weren’t the best examples either.

Fortunately, there’s been a lot of psychological research into healthy and happy relationships the past few decades and there are some general principles that keep popping up consistently that most people are unaware of or don’t follow. In fact, some of these principles actually go against what is traditionally considered “romantic” or normal in a relationship.

Below are six of the most common tendencies in relationships that many couples think are healthy and normal, but are actually toxic and destroying everything you hold dear. Get the tissues ready.

1. The Relationship Scorecard

What It Is: The “keeping score” phenomenon is when someone you’re dating continues to blame you for past mistakes you made in the relationship. If both people in the relationship do this it devolves into what I call “the relationship scorecard,” where it becomes a battle to see who has screwed up the most over the months or years, and therefore who owes the other one more.

You were an asshole at Cynthia’s 28th birthday party back in 2010 and it has proceeded to ruin your life ever since. Why? Because there’s not a week that goes by that you’re not reminded of it. But that’s OK, because that time you caught her sending flirtatious text messages to her co-worker immediately removes her right to get jealous, so it’s kind of even, right?

Wrong.

Why It’s Toxic: The relationship scorecard develops over time because one or both people in a relationship use past wrongdoings in order to try and justify current righteousness. This is a double-whammy of suckage. Not only are you deflecting the current issue itself, but you’re ginning up guilt and bitterness from the past to manipulate your partner into feeling wrong in the present.

If this goes on long enough, both partners eventually spend most of their energy trying to prove that they’re less culpable than the other, rather than solving the current problem. People spend all of their time trying to be less wrong for each other instead of being more right for each other.

What You Should Do Instead: Deal with issues individually unless they are legitimately connected. If someone habitually cheats, then that’s obviously a recurring problem. But the fact that she embarrassed you in 2010 and that now she got sad and ignored you today have nothing to do with each other, so don’t bring it up.

You must recognize that by choosing to be with your significant other, you are choosing to be with all of their prior actions and behaviors. If you don’t accept those, then ultimately, you are not accepting them. If something bothered you that much a year ago, you should have dealt with it a year ago.

2. Dropping “Hints” and Other Passive-Aggression

What It Is: Instead of stating a desire or thought overtly, your partner tries to nudge you in the right direction of figuring it out yourself. Instead of saying what’s actually upsetting you, you find small and petty ways to piss your partner off so you’ll then feel justified in complaining to them.

Why It’s Toxic: Because it shows that you two are not comfortable communicating openly and clearly with one another. A person has no reason to be passive-aggressive if they feel safe expressing any anger or insecurity within the relationship. A person will never feel a need to drop “hints” if they feel like they won’t be judged or criticized for it.

What You Should Do Instead: State your feelings and desires openly. And make it clear that the other person is not necessarily responsible or obligated to them but that you’d love to have their support. If they love you, they’ll almost always be able to give it.

3. Holding the Relationship Hostage

What It Is: When one person has a simple criticism or complaint and blackmails the other person by threatening the commitment of the relationship as a whole. For instance, if someone feels like you’ve been cold to them, instead of saying, “I feel like you’re being cold sometimes,” they will say, “I can’t date someone who is cold to me all of the time.”

Why It’s Toxic: It’s emotional blackmail and it creates tons of unnecessary drama. Every minor hiccup in the flow of the relationship results in a perceived commitment crisis. It’s crucial for both people in a relationship to know that negative thoughts and feelings can be communicated safely to one another without it threatening the relationship itself. Otherwise, people will suppress their true thoughts and feelings which leads to an environment of distrust and manipulation.

What You Should Do Instead: It’s fine to get upset at your partner or to not like something about them. That’s called being a normal human being. But understand that committing to a person and always liking a person are not the same thing. One can be committed to someone and not like everything about them. One can be eternally devoted to someone yet actually be annoyed or angered by their partner at times. On the contrary, two partners who are capable of communicating feedback and criticism towards one another, only without judgment or blackmail, will strengthen their commitment to one another in the long-run.

4. Blaming Your Partner For Your Own Emotions

What It Is: Let’s say you’re having a crappy day and your partner isn’t exactly being super sympathetic or supportive at the moment. They’ve been on the phone all day with some people from work. They got distracted when you hugged them. You want to lay around at home together and just watch a movie tonight, but they have plans to go out and see their friends.

So you lash out at them for being so insensitive and callous toward you. You’ve been having a shitty day and they have done nothing about it. Sure, you never asked, but they should just know to make you feel better. They should have gotten off the phone and ditched their plans based on your lousy emotional state.

Why It’s Toxic: Blaming our partners for our emotions is a subtle form of selfishness and a classic example of the poor maintenance of personal boundaries. When you set a precedent that your partner is responsible for how you feel at all times (and vice-versa), you will develop codependent tendencies. Suddenly, they’re not allowed to plan activities without checking with you first. All activities at home — even the mundane ones like reading books or watching TV — must be negotiated and compromised. When someone begins to get upset, all personal desires go out the window because it is now your responsibility to make one another feel better.

The biggest problem of developing these codependent tendencies is that they breed resentment. Sure, if my girlfriend gets mad at me once in a while because she’s had a shitty day and is frustrated and needs attention, that’s understandable. But if it becomes an expectation that my life revolves around her emotional well-being at all times, then I’m soon going to become very bitter and even manipulative towards her feelings and desires.

What You Should Do Instead: Take responsibility for your own emotions and expect your partner to be responsible for theirs. There’s a subtle yet important difference between being supportive of your partner and being obligated to your partner. Any sacrifices should be made as an autonomous choice and not seen as an expectation. As soon as both people in a relationship become culpable for each other’s moods and downswings, it gives them both incentives to hide their true feelings and manipulate one another.

5. Displays of “Loving” Jealousy

What It Is: Getting pissed off when your partner talks, touches, calls, texts, hangs out, or sneezes in the general vicinity of another person and then you proceed to take that anger out on your partner and attempt to control their behavior. This often leads to insano behaviors such as hacking into your partner’s email account, looking through their text messages while they’re in the shower or even following them around town and showing up unannounced when they’re not expecting you.

Why It’s Toxic: It surprises me that some people describe this as some sort of display of affection. They figure that if their partner wasn’t jealous, then that would somehow mean that they weren’t loved by them.

This is absolutely clownshit crazy to me. It’s controlling and manipulative. It creates unnecessary drama and fighting. It transmits a message of a lack of trust in the other person. And to be honest, it’s demeaning. If my girlfriend cannot trust me to be around other attractive women by myself, then it implies that she believes that I’m either a) a liar, or b) incapable of controlling my impulses. In either case, that’s a woman I do not want to be dating.

What You Should Do Instead: Trust your partner. It’s a radical idea, I know. Some jealousy is natural. But excessive jealousy and controlling behaviors towards your partner are signs of your own feelings of unworthiness and you should learn to deal with them and not force them onto those close to you. Because otherwise, you are only going to eventually push that person away.

6. Buying the Solutions to Relationship Problems

What It Is: Any time a major conflict or issue comes up in the relationship, instead of solving it, one covers it up with the excitement and good feelings that come with buying something nice or going on a trip somewhere.

My parents were experts at this one. And it got them real far: a big fat divorce and 15 years of hardly speaking to each other since. They have both since independently told me that this was the primary problem in their marriage: continuously covering up their real issues with superficial pleasures.

Why It’s Toxic: Not only does it brush the real problem under the rug (where it will always re-emerge and even worse the next time), but it sets an unhealthy precedent within the relationship. This is not a gender-specific problem, but I will use the traditional gendered situation as an example. Let’s imagine that whenever a woman gets angry at her boyfriend/husband, the man “solves” the issue by buying the woman something nice, or taking her to a nice restaurant or something. Not only does this give the woman unconscious incentive to find more reasons to be upset with the man, but it also gives the man absolutely no incentive to actually be accountable for the problems in the relationship. So what do you end up with? A checked-out husband who feels like an ATM, and an incessantly bitter woman who feels unheard.

What You Should Do Instead: Actually, you know, deal with the problem. Trust was broken? Talk about what it will take to rebuild it. Someone feels ignored or unappreciated? Talk about ways to restore those feelings of appreciation. Communicate!

There’s nothing wrong with doing nice things for a significant other after a fight to show solidarity and to reaffirm commitment. But one should never use gifts or fancy things to replace dealing with the underlying emotional issues. Gifts and trips are called luxuries for a reason, you only get to appreciate them when everything else is already good. If you use them to cover up your problems, then you will find yourself with a much bigger problem down the line.

——–Mark Manson is the author of The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life.